RRBDLAW.COM

INDEX PAGE ONLINE BIOGRAPHY EMAIL RRBDLAW.COM



LOOKING OVER YOUR OWN SHOULDER

The days of the "one-man shop" were once thought to be numbered. However, these independents are stubbornly holding on; recently given a new lease on life through the power of the personal computer and the Internet. Nonetheless, such mom-and-pop operations remain in the regulators' crosshairs. On December 9, 1998, the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") instituted public administrative proceedings against FSC Securities Corporation ("FSC"), an NASD member firm engaged in a general securities business, primarily through small branch offices and independent contractor-registered representatives. FSC submitted an Offer of Settlement ("Offer") [without admitting or denying the findings set forth], which the SEC accepted.

THE ONE-PERSON OSJ

Throughout 1992 through 1995 ("the relevant period"), a registered representative of FSC operated a one-person Office of Supervisory Jurisdiction ("OSJ") as an independent contractor ("the RR") and engaged in sales practice abuses including improper mutual fund switching and the sale of securities that were unsuitable investments for customers.

One-person OSJs are, in effect, mini BDs, with the Home Office often functioning as nothing more than a glorified bookkeeper. However, the Home Office still retains liability for compliance failures and management may find itself charged with failure to supervise. The regulators are particularly wary of OSJ Principals who are the sole population of a given Branch Office or who engage in full-time production while allegedly supervising an OSJ.

INADEQUATE TOOLS

ýDuring the relevant period, FSC did not generate for its supervisory personnel an automated exception report that could reliably detect mutual fund switching.

The SEC has issued several recent decisions and Orders concerning mutual fund switching. RRs and supervisors should expect to have this area scrutinized. Make sure that your firm is generating adequate supervisory reports to enable you to monitor your transactions.

WATCHING YOURSELF? WE DON'T THINK SO.

ýDuring the relevant period, OSJ Principals were the primary supervisors of their subordinate registered representatives, but these Principals also had their own business and customers. Further, the production of these OSJ Principals was not supervised by any designated individual. The SEC deemed this system of supervision inadequate.

LThe SEC has always frowns upon producing supervisors; if the regulators had their druthers, it is clear that they would prohibit or severely limit the practice. However, for smaller firms there is often no economically viable alternative. As a result, this issue remains a source of contention within the industry. Regardless of your position on the matter, if you engage in production and supervision, it's a good idea to make sure that a particular Principal supervises you. This practice should also be specified in the firm's Written Supervisory Procedures.

HOW MUCH IS ENOUGH?

ýFSC failed to implement procedures sufficient to assure that compliance auditors would examine a sufficient number of customer accounts during audits of OSJs. As a result, with regard to audits of the Registered Representative's OSJ, FSC could not document to the SEC's satisfaction that the firm had reviewed an adequate number of accounts for evidence of sales practice abuse.

Internal compliance audits cannot be sleepwalks. You can't simply go through the motions. Expect whatever you review will be challenged by a regulator, and be prepared to defend your methods and conclusions. This means that you must document what was reviewed, when it was reviewed, and who did the reviewing. Unfortunately, the regulators love to criticize the industry for inadequate supervision, but then provide guidance through such baffling critiques as failure to examine or document a sufficient number or an adequate number of accounts.

THE SANCTIONS

For the reasons cited above, the SEC ordered FSC Censured and fined $50,000. FSC was also ordered to comply with its undertaking to retain an acceptable Independent Consultant to review FSC's supervisory, compliance, and other policies and procedures.


For Further Reference:

In The Matter Of FSC Securities Corporation (Order Instituting Public Proceedings, Making Findings, And Imposing Sanctions, 34-40765, Admin. Proc. 3-9785, December 9, 1998).





RRBDLAW.COM AND SECURITIES INDUSTRY COMMENTATOR™ © 2004 BILL SINGER

THIS WEBSITE MAY BE DEEMED AN ATTORNEY ADVERTISEMENT OR SOLICITATION IN SOME JURISDICTIONS. AS SUCH, PLEASE NOTE THAT THE HIRING OF AN ATTORNEY IS AN IMPORTANT DECISION THAT SHOULD NOT BE BASED SOLELY UPON ADVERTISEMENTS. MOREOVER, PRIOR RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE A SIMILAR OUTCOME. NEITHER THE TRANSMISSION NOR YOUR RECEIPT OF ANY CONTENT ON THIS WEBSITE WILL CREATE AN ATTORNEY-CLIENT RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE SENDER AND RECEIVER. WEBSITE SUBSCRIBERS AND ONLINE READERS SHOULD NOT TAKE, OR REFRAIN FROM TAKING, ANY ACTION BASED UPON CONTENT ON THIS WEBSITE. THE CONTENT PUBLISHED ON THIS WEBSITE REPRESENTS THE PERSONAL VIEWS OF THE AUTHOR AND NOT NECESSARILY THE VIEWS OF ANY LAW FIRM OR ORGANIZATION WITH WHICH HE MAY BE AFFILIATED. ALL CONTENT IS PROVIDED AS GENERAL INFORMATION ONLY AND MUST NOT BE RELIED UPON AS LEGAL ADVICE. CONTENT ON THIS WEBSITE MAY BE INCORRECT FOR YOUR JURISDICTION AND THE UNDERLYING RULES, REGULATIONS AND/OR DECISIONS MAY NO LONGER BE CONTROLLING OR PERSUASIVE AS A MATTER OF LAW OR INTERPRETATION.


Telephone: 917-520-2836
Fax at 720-559-2800
E-mail to bsinger@rrbdlaw.com

FOR DETAILS ABOUT MR. SINGER, PLEASE READ HIS
ONLINE BIOGRAPHY
PAGE TOP