Securities Industry Commentator by Bill Singer Esq

May 27, 2021









25 years after the 'Boom Boom Room' lawsuit, Wall Street still has a long way to go (CNN by Susan Antilla)
https://www.cnn.com/2021/05/27/perspectives/boom-boom-room-lawsuit-wall-street/index.html
Looking back at her historic coverage, veteran journalist Susan Antilla observes in part that:

A quarter of a century after what became known as "the Boom Boom Room" lawsuit, Wall Street still has a long way to go in giving women the respect they deserve. Critical to fixing the problem is getting more women in the top jobs in finance, and establishing a system where sexual harassers are exposed and punished, not protected.

Rockland County Man Convicted For Running Multimillion-Dollar Ponzi And Embezzlement Schemes (DOJ Release)
https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/pr/rockland-county-man-convicted-running-multimillion-dollar-ponzi-and-embezzlement
Ruless Pierre was convicted in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
on two counts of securities fraud, one count of wire fraud, and one count of structuring. As alleged in part in the DOJ Release:

Investment Promissory Fraud

From at least November 2016 through October 2019, PIERRE solicited money from investors of Ruless Pierre Consulting Group ("RPCG") by falsely promising them that he would earn a 20 percent return on their initial investment every 60 days through stock trading (hereinafter, the "Promissory Note Fraud").  The investments were memorialized in documents known as "Investment Promissory Notes."  These investment contracts generally promised that the investor would be paid 20 percent interest every 60 days and that the investor could withdraw all funds from the investment with 30 days' notice.  Based on these documents and the false representations of PIERRE, the investors understood that their principal and interest were guaranteed.  

During the course of the investment fraud scheme, PIERRE fraudulently obtained over $2 million from nearly 100 investors.  After receiving money from investors, PIERRE deposited the money into one of his personal bank accounts or bank accounts of RPCG.  PIERRE then transferred the money to trading accounts, where he engaged in unprofitable day trading.  Despite his trading losses, PIERRE repeatedly and falsely represented to investors, including in investment statements containing fictitious balances, that the trading was profitable and that their investments were growing as promised.  In addition to losing their money, PIERRE also used investors' funds to pay for personal expenses, including luxury vehicles.  Additionally, PIERRE further concealed the truth from investors by using money obtained from new investors to make redemption payments to previous investors, in Ponzi-like fashion.

The Franchise Investment Fraud

Beginning in or about November 2018, PIERRE began to offer investors, including some individuals who invested in his Promissory Note Fraud, the opportunity to purchase partnership interests in a partnership that would run three fast-food franchise locations (hereinafter, the "Franchise Investment Fraud").   At the time, PIERRE did not own any of the fast-food franchises, but he was in discussions regarding purchasing them.  Each investment was memorialized in a document entitled "Silent Partnership Agreement." 

The Silent Partnership Agreements promised the investors a 5 percent monthly return on the investment, in addition to a 40 percent pro rata share of the quarterly gross operating profit.  The minimum investment was $5,000. 

The Silent Partnership Agreements further provided that RULESS PIERRE was the General Partner, and that he was responsible "for the complete management, control, and policies related to the operation and conduct of the business."

PIERRE received financial statements for the franchise locations, which showed minimal profits.  Nonetheless, PIERRE promised investors an unrealistic 5 percent monthly return on their investment.

In or about April 2019, PIERRE purchased one fast food franchise for approximately $50,000.  PIERRE did not purchase the other franchises.

PIERRE deposited the fast-food franchise investors' money in various bank accounts, which commingled the funds from the Franchise Investment Fraud with the Promissory Note Fraud.  In Ponzi-like fashion, PIERRE fraudulently misappropriated some of the fast-food franchise investors' money to pay back investors in the Promissory Note Fraud.

In total, PIERRE raised at least $200,000 by selling the Silent Partnership Agreements to at least 18 investors.  Some of the investors were paid their 5 percent monthly distribution, but the vast majority of the investors were not made whole.  The fast-food franchise went out of business in December 2019.

The Embezzlement Fraud Scheme

In another scheme, PIERRE embezzled money from his former employers.  From approximately 2007 until February 2016, PIERRE was the director of finance for two different hotels, which were owned by the same company ("Company-1").  One hotel was located in the Palisades, New York ("Hotel-1"), while the other was located in Armonk, New York ("Hotel-2") (collectively, "the Hotels").  As the director of finance, PIERRE was the signatory on several bank accounts held in the name of the management companies that managed the Hotels ("Management Companies"). 

After August 2018, PIERRE no longer worked at either Hotel-1 or Hotel-2, but he regularly wrote himself checks payable to cash from the Management Companies' bank accounts.  Specifically, from September 2018 through March 2019, PIERRE wrote over 70 checks to "cash" or "petty cash" from one of the bank accounts for Hotel-1, for over $300,000.

In addition, from March 2017 through 2019, PIERRE deposited large amounts of cash into his personal bank accounts in amounts that were generally less than $10,000.  The deposits were conducted at various bank locations and typically took place on the same day, consecutive days, or within a short period of time.  For example, in just seven months, from June 2018 through December 2018, PIERRE deposited approximately $225,612, through 138 cash deposits all under $10,000, into a bank account in the name of RPCG.

Westport Man Sentenced to Prison for Defrauding Investors, Making False Statements to SEC (DOJ Release)
|https://www.justice.gov/usao-ct/pr/westport-man-sentenced-prison-defrauding-investors-making-false-statements-sec
Barton Stuck, 74, pled guilty in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut to one count of wire fraud, one count of engaging in illegal monetary transactions, and two counts of making false statements to the Securities and Exchange Commission; and he was sentenced to 12 months and one day in prison plus three years of supervised release. As alleged in part in the DOJ Release:

[S]tuck controlled related business entities, including Signal Lake General Partner LLC, Signal Lake Operations LLC, Signal Lake Management LLC, Signal Lake Side Fund LP, Signal Lake Side Fund II LP, Signal Lake Side Fund IIA LP, Signal Lake Top Prospects Fund, and SLT Logic LLC (collectively, the "Signal Lake entities").  The Signal Lake entities were venture capital vehicles investing in various technology companies.  Stuck solicited investments for the Signal Lake entities.

In 2015 and 2016, Stuck committed fraud by, among other things, misrepresenting the financial health and prospects of the Signal Lake entities and their investments in order to enrich himself.  In one instance, Stuck made misrepresentations to an undercover FBI agent posing as a prospective investor.  Stuck falsely guaranteed a payment of twice the original $500,000 investment, and falsely claimed that a Signal Lake entity had $200 million in a particular bank account when, in fact, the balance of the bank account at the time was $.50.  He also falsely stated that a $50,000 fee he required would be used for accounting and legal expenses.  When the undercover agent paid Stuck the $50,000 fee, Stuck used it for personal expenditures.

Stuck also made false statements in forms that he filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission in 2016 and 2017.  Specifically, Stuck falsely claimed that a Signal Lake entity managed and had a gross asset value of $145 million, and was subject to annual audits by a Stamford accounting firm.

SEC Charges Mutual Fund Executives with Misleading Investors Regarding Investment Risks in Funds that Suffered $1 Billion Trading Loss (SEC Release)
https://www.sec.gov/news/press-release/2021-89
In a Complaint filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
https://www.sec.gov/litigation/complaints/2021/comp-pr2021-89.pdf, the SEC charged LJM Funds Management Ltd. and LJM Partners Ltd. and their portfolio managers, Anthony Caine and Anish Parvataneni with violating the antifraud provisions of the federal securities laws and seeks permanent injunctions, disgorgement with prejudgment interest, and civil penalties. In related proceedings, the SEC instituted settled administrative and cease-and-desist proceedings against LJM's Chief Risk Officer, Arjuna Ariathurai. who, without admitting or denying the SEC's findings, agreed to an associational bar with a right to apply for reentry after three years, disgorgement and prejudgment interest of $97,444, and a civil penalty of $150,000. In parallel actions, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission today announced charges against LJM, Caine, Parvataneni, and Ariathurai. As alleged in part in the SEC Release:

[LJM] adopted a short volatility trading strategy that carried risks that were remote but extreme. The complaint alleges that, in order to ease investor concerns about the potential for losses, LJM, Caine and Parvataneni made a series of misstatements to investors and the mutual fund's board about LJM's risk management practices, including false statements about its use of historical event stress testing and its commitment to maintaining a consistent risk profile instead of prioritizing returns. The complaint further alleges that, beginning in late 2017, during a period of historically low volatility, LJM, Caine, and Parvataneni increased the level of risk in the portfolios in order to chase return targets, while falsely assuring investors that the portfolios' risk profiles remained stable. According to the complaint, in February 2018, the markets suffered a large spike in volatility, resulting in catastrophic trading losses exceeding $1 billion, or more than 80% of the value of the funds LJM managed, over two trading days.

Testimony Before the Subcommittee on Financial Services and General Government, U.S. House Appropriations Committee by SEC Chair Gary Gensler
https://www.sec.gov/news/testimony/gensler-2021-05-26
As SEC Chair Gensler noted in his opening testimony:

[I]'d like to highlight five of the key capital market trends that will affect our resource needs going forward:

  • Initial Public Offerings and Special Purpose Acquisition Companies
  • Private Funds
  • Crypto Assets
  • Fintech
  • Data Analytics
SEC Charges Medical Investigator with Insider Trading On Confidential Information from Clinical Trial (SEC Release)
https://www.sec.gov/litigation/litreleases/2021/lr25099.htm
In a Complaint filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California
https://www.sec.gov/litigation/complaints/2021/comp25099.pdf, the SEC alleged that Dr. Mohammed A. Bari violated the antifraud provisions of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. Without admitting or denying the allegations in the Complaint, Bari agree to be permanently enjoined from violated the cited provisions and to pay a $238,434 penalty. As alleged in part in the SEC Release:

Bari was a medical investigator for the clinical trial of KarXT, a drug developed by Boston-based Karuna Therapeutics, Inc. for treating patients with schizophrenia. The complaint alleges that, in mid-November 2019, Karuna informed Bari that KarXT had proven safe and effective in the trial, and that Karuna planned to announce these results to the public within a few days. Karuna's management allegedly described the KarXT trial results to Bari as a significant milestone for the company. According to the complaint, Bari began placing orders to purchase Karuna common stock within hours of learning this information, and ultimately acquired more than 1,600 shares. The complaint alleges that Karuna publicly announced the positive results on November 18, 2019, and its stock price increased by more than 440 percent, earning Bari profits of nearly $120,000 by trading in advance of that announcement.

Order Determining Whistleblower Award Claim (CFTC Whistleblower Award Determination No. 21-08)
https://www.whistleblower.gov/sites/whistleblower/files/2021-05/21-WB-06.pdf
The CFTC's Claims Review Staff ("CRS") issued a Preliminary Determination recommending that Claimant receive a Whistleblower Award. In ordering the Award, the CFTC Order states in part that:

[A]fter causing the Division to open an investigation, Claimant significantly assisted the Division's investigation by providing additional information and producing materials that were direct evidence of Defendants' violations. Division staff interviewed Claimant in-depth at an in-person meeting and several times after by phone as Clamant produced additional documents and provided explanations about those documents. . . .

Order Determining Whistleblower Award Claim (SEC Whistleblower Award, '34 Act Rel. No. 92037, Whistleblower Award Proc. File No. 2021-51)
https://www.sec.gov/rules/other/2021/34-92037.pdf
The SEC's Claims Review Staff ("CRS") issued a Preliminary Determination recommending that Claimant 1 receive a Whistleblower Award of $4.2 million but that Claimant 2 be denied same. In ordering the Award to Claimant 1 and denying same to Claimant 2, the SEC Order found that Claimant 1 had prompted the opening of the investigation and had "provided substantial assistance by meeting with investigative staff multiple times, identifying key players, and providing additional helpful information and documents." In contrast to Claimant 1, the Order characterizes Claimant 2 as having "failed to provide information that cuased any of the Underlying Investigations to open or that significantly contributed . . ." Moreover, the Order notes that Enforcement Staff "submitted a declaration averring that they did not communicate with, or use any information from, Claimant 2."

FINRA Arbitrators Cite RBC Investigator's Tactics In Disrespectful Award 
(BrokeAndBroker.com Blog)
http://www.brokeandbroker.com/5871/finra-respectful/
Every so often, I come across something that elicits a "what the hell?" Today's BrokeAndBroker.com Blog features just such an item in the form of two associated persons suing their former employer, RBC Capital Markets, LLC, and another RBC employee. Somehow it all comes down to a lack of respect, or not.

http://www.brokeandbrok er.com/5868/finra-expungement/
Some things are debatable. For example, when public customers complain about misconduct by their stockbroker, there may be some points raised in the Complaint or Answer that may, or may not, be true. That's where the adversarial system comes into play and we rely upon a panel of arbitrators to sift through the evidence. On the other hand, some things aren't debatable -- the facts speak for themselves and dispel any notion of uncertainty. In a recent FINRA arbitration, it seems that the stockbroker had done no wrong. Worse, he blew the whistle on the bad guy. Why then did that whistleblower need to bear the burden of filing for an expungement? Why didn't FINRA step in and do the right thing, at its own cost?