|
|
 |
|
NOTE:
Offers of Settlement (OS) and Letters of Acceptance, Waiver, and Consent (AWC)
are entered into by Respondents without admitting or denying the
allegations, but consent is given to the described sanctions and to the
entry of findings.
2006
Continuing Education
see the NASD Continuing Education Rule
|
|
|
|
|
Libertas Partners, LLC
AWC/#E112005021201/December 2006
The Firm permitted individuals to perform duties that require
registration while their NASD registrations
were inactive due to their failure to complete the Regulatory Element
of the Continuing Education Program.
Libertas Partners, LLC: Censured; Fined $10,000
|
Richard Lewis Rosen (Principal)
#E102002179201/November 2006
Acting through Rosen, his member firm
- served as a broker for transactions that involved unregistered
securities for which Rosen received commissions;
- violated its membership
agreement with NASD and effected
material changes in his member firm’s business operations without
filing an application for approval with NASD;
- effected securities transactions while failing to meet its minimum net
capital requirement;
- did not have an adequate system in place for the retention of electronic
mail;
- failed to designate a FINOP
for more than a year; and
- failed to create and maintain a general ledger, and to create
records that reflected the firm’s assets and liabilities, income and
expenses and capital accounts.
Rosen failed to complete the regulatory element of NASD’s Continuing
Education requirement, which caused his registration to be inactive
while he continued to effect securities transactions and serve as a
president of the firm. The findings also included that the firm, acting
through Rosen, (NASD Case )
Richard Lewis Rosen: Barred
|
Michael Ta-Zen Huang
#2005000476101)/July 2006
Huang misrepresented his identity by using
another registered representative’s computer password to complete a
firm-required continuing education session for the other registered
representative. Huang failed to respond to NASD requests for
information.
Michael Ta-Zen Huang: Barred
|
Research Capital USA Inc.
AWC/#E112005001102/June 2006
The Firm failed
- to implement and enforce its Customer
Identification Program, failed to establish an independent
testing function to review and assess the adequacy of and level of
compliance with its own anti-money laundering (AML) compliance
program, and failed to conduct AML training;
- (acting through an individual) conduct required annual
compliance meetings with each of its registered
representatives, and failed to enforce its written supervisory
procedure requiring their attendance; and
- have a written needs analysis and a written training plan in order
to achieve compliance with the Firm Element of the Continuing
Education Rule.
Research Capital USA Inc. : Censured; Fined $20,000 ($5,000 of which
joint/several with unnamed individual)
|
Bullaro Securities Corp.and Sal Stephen Bullaro (Principal)
AWC/#ELI20040026-01/June 2006
Firm permitted Bullaro—the firm’s president and sole executive
officer, Chief Compliance Officer and Financial and Operations Principal—to
conduct securities business while his securities registration was inactive
due to his failure to timely
satisfy the Continuing Education/Regulatory Element requirement.
Acting through Bullaro, the Firm failed to include in its trial balances
any of the firm’s proprietary positions and related haircut charges
associated with its substantial American Stock Exchange floor business
that resulted in its net capital
computations being inaccurate.
Bullaro Securities Corp.: Censured; Fined $10,000 (joint/several with
Bullaro)
Sal Stephen Bullaro (Principal): Fined $10,000 (jt/sev with
Bullaro Securities); Suspended 30 days in FINOP capacity
|
Desjardins Securities International, Inc.
AWC/#E112004005401/May 2006
The Firm did not maintain and preserve all email
and instant messaging
communications, as required by SEC rule 17a-4. The Firm failed to complete
an annual training needs analysis and to develop and implement its written
training plan to achieve compliance with the Firm Element of the
Continuing Education Rule.
Desjardins Securities International, Inc.: Censured; Fined $130,000;
Required to revise its procedures with respect to applicable securities
laws and regulations, and NASD rules concerning the preservation of
electronic communications.
|
Sky Capital LLC (CRD #114657, New York, New York)
AWC/E1020030479-02/February 2006
Sky Capital LLC acted as a placement agent in private placement
offerings involving minimum-maximum
contingencies, and was not included as a party in any written
agreement with a bank under which the bank agreed to hold all money or
other consideration received in escrow for the persons who had the
beneficial interests therein, and to transmit or return such funds
directly to the persons entitled thereto when the appropriate event or
contingency had occurred. The firm permitted an individual to act in a
capacity that required registration while his NASD registration status was
inactive due to his failure to complete the Regulatory Element of NASD’s
Continuing Education Requirement.
Sky Capital LLC: Censured; Fined $15,000
|
Thieme Securities, Inc. and Heiko Helmut Thieme (Principal)
AWC/E102004040401/January 2006
Acting through Thieme, the Firm
- operated without a registered Financial and Operations Principal (FINOP)
from February 2002 to September 2004; and
- failed to develop an annual written training plan for Firm
Element/Continuing Education requirement for 2000 to 2004; and
- failed to maintain monthly bank
reconciliations.
Thieme Securities and Heiko Helmut Thieme: Censured; Fined $15,000
(joint/several)
|
|
Bill Singer's Comment:
Frankly, the sanctions here seem a bit light when compared to other recent
matters involving similar lapses --- possibly the Respondents had
excellent legal representation or the NASD considered some mitigating
factors. In any event we're talking about a firm without a FINOP for
over 2 years and without a CE plan for 4 years. And let's not even
forget the basic requirement to maintain your bank recons.
|
THIS WEBSITE MAY BE DEEMED AN ATTORNEY ADVERTISEMENT OR SOLICITATION IN SOME JURISDICTIONS. AS SUCH, PLEASE NOTE THAT THE HIRING OF AN ATTORNEY IS AN IMPORTANT DECISION THAT SHOULD NOT BE BASED SOLELY UPON ADVERTISEMENTS. MOREOVER, PRIOR RESULTS DO NOT GUARANTEE A SIMILAR OUTCOME. NEITHER THE TRANSMISSION NOR YOUR RECEIPT OF ANY CONTENT ON THIS WEBSITE WILL CREATE AN ATTORNEY-CLIENT RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE SENDER AND RECEIVER. WEBSITE SUBSCRIBERS AND ONLINE READERS SHOULD NOT TAKE, OR REFRAIN FROM TAKING, ANY ACTION BASED UPON CONTENT ON THIS WEBSITE. THE CONTENT PUBLISHED ON THIS WEBSITE REPRESENTS THE PERSONAL VIEWS OF THE AUTHOR AND NOT NECESSARILY THE VIEWS OF ANY LAW FIRM OR ORGANIZATION WITH WHICH HE MAY BE AFFILIATED. ALL CONTENT IS PROVIDED AS GENERAL INFORMATION ONLY AND MUST NOT BE RELIED UPON AS LEGAL ADVICE. CONTENT ON THIS WEBSITE MAY BE INCORRECT FOR YOUR JURISDICTION AND THE UNDERLYING RULES, REGULATIONS AND/OR DECISIONS MAY NO LONGER BE CONTROLLING OR PERSUASIVE AS A MATTER OF LAW OR INTERPRETATION.
|
 |
|