|
|
|
In
In
the Matter of the Continued Association of X MC-400: June 2001 Redacted
Decision |
DENIED by Hearing Panel of the NASDR Statutory Disqualification Committee/ NAC |
|
SD Event |
In
1997 the SEC alleged that X had engaged in insider
trading that allegedly resulted in profits of $7,900 in his own account, and
$29,512.50 in that of his clients. |
|
Sentence expiration |
Permanent Injunction |
|
Prior Industry Activity |
X has been an RR with three firms (including current sponsor) since 1963, and with sponsor since 1996. No regulatory history |
|
Background |
X is 76 years old and in failing health. At the hearing he denied involvement in insider trading and claimed that his pro bono attorney told him to sign the consent judgment. |
|
Sponsoring Firm |
Firm an NASD member since 1958 (subject to name change in 1996). A general securities business clearing on a fully-disclosed basis. 16 branches. 10 registered principals and 90 RRs. 1999
State1 administrative complaint pending that alleges sales
practice violations, supervisory lapses, and books/records
violations. 1998
State2 issued ex parte cease and desist order for
unregistered securities sales, supervisory lapses, and failing to
respond to customer complaint.1998
firm consented to a cease and desist order issued by In 1997 the firm entered into a consent degree in furtherance of a prior 1996 cease and desist order issued on consent by State4that alleged supervisory violations. 1993 AWC for books and records violations: $2,500 Fine/Censure.1998 AWC for MSRB violations: $4,000 fine/Censure. |
|
Proposed Activity |
X
to continue as a general securities representative in |
|
Proposed Supervisor |
Home
Office Manager. RR since
1975 and a GSP since 1984. Subject of 1996 arbitration claim by two customers
alleging failure to follow instructions to sell stock. Proposed Supervisor
denied allegations but was ordered to pay $4,000 of the $24,396 in compensatory
damages sought. |
|
Member Regulation Recommendation |
Denial |
|
Considerations |
Recency
and seriousness of the insider trading injunction. Sponsoring
Firm's disciplinary historyraises concerns as to ability to
properly supervise X. |
|
Citations |
|
RRBDLAW.COM AND SECURITIES INDUSTRY COMMENTATOR™ © 2004 BILL SINGER THE ARTICLES PUBLISHED HERE REPRESENT THE PERSONAL VIEWS OF THE AUTHOR, AND NOT NECESSARILY THE VIEWS OF ANY LAW FIRM OR ORGANIZATION WITH WHICH HE MAY BE AFFILIATED. ALL STATEMENTS MADE IN THESE ARTICLES ARE FOR GENERAL INFORMATION ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED TO PROVIDE, NOR SHOULD THEY BE RELIED ON AS, LEGAL ADVICE. READERS MUST CONSULT WITH QUALIFIED LEGAL COUNSEL BEFORE RELYING UPON ANY CONTENT CONTAINED HEREIN. STATEMENTS MADE IN THESE ARTICLES MAY BE INCORRECT FOR YOUR JURISDICTION OR AT THE TIME WHEN YOU READ SUCH STATEMENTS THE UNDERLYING RULES, REGULATIONS AND/OR DECISIONS MAY NO LONGER BE CONTROLLING OR PERSUASIVE AS A MATTER OF LAW OR INTERPRETATION. Telephone: 917-520-2836 Secondary telephone: 212-269-1400 Fax at 720-559-2800 E-mail to rrbdlawyer@aol.com FOR DETAILS ABOUT MR. SINGER, PLEASE READ HIS ONLINE BIOGRAPHY |