RRBDLAW.COM

INDEX PAGE ONLINE BIOGRAPHY EMAIL RRBDLAW.COM



Find Books Barnes and Noble.com

REGULATORY CASES OF NOTE

NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE, INC. 

STIPULATION OF FACTS AND CONSENT TO PENALTY
DIVISION OF ENFORCEMENT v.
PRENTICE SECURITIES,INC.
Exchange Hearing Panel Decision
02-150
July 19, 2002, 
Hearing Officer ---
Edward W. Morris, Jr.

SOURCE CITE

 

A Stipulation of Facts and Consent to Penalty is submitted by the Respondent without admitting or deny guilt, but merely consenting to findings by the Hearing Panel.

NYSE Rule 342

Firm failed to reasonably supervise and control its activities by permitting producing BOM to recommend unsuitable junk bonds (at unacceptable levels of concentration). Issue of producing BOM supervising own sales practices. Censure, $25,000 fine, independent compliance consultant

Prentice Securities, Inc. submitted a Stipulation of Facts and Consent to Penalty to the NYSE, which was accepted by the Hearing Panel as set forth below.

During 1997-1999, PSI's Milwaukee branch solicited so-called junk bonds for 30 customers .  All the accounts at issue were handled by producing Branch Office Manager AB and by one of two registered representatives CD or DF.  The junk bonds were not priced on account statements and made up a substantial portion of or the total assets in the accounts.  Based upon the customers' objectives, experience, and resources such concentrations in highly speculative securities were deemed unsuitable by NYSE.

25 customers filed complaints against PSI seeking damages ranging from $20,000 to $75,000 each.  To date PSI has settled 11 complaints for approximately $460,000.  At least five of the junk bonds defaulted.  

NYSE determined that PSI failed to 

  1. reasonably supervise and control its business activities to detect and/or prevent the unsuitable transactions at issue;

  2. implement and maintain adequate supervisory procedures for the branch office and its producing manager; and

  3. review the suitability of corporate bonds recommended by the manager and two RRs (particular criticism noted for permitting BOM to supervise his own sales activities).

Hearing Panel imposed a Censure, $25,000 fine, undertaking to retain outside consultant 

 

RETURN TO REGULATORY CASES OF NOTE INDEX





RRBDLAW.COM AND SECURITIES INDUSTRY COMMENTATOR™ © 2004 BILL SINGER

THE ARTICLES PUBLISHED HERE REPRESENT THE PERSONAL VIEWS OF THE AUTHOR, AND NOT NECESSARILY THE VIEWS OF ANY LAW FIRM OR ORGANIZATION WITH WHICH HE MAY BE AFFILIATED. ALL STATEMENTS MADE IN THESE ARTICLES ARE FOR GENERAL INFORMATION ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED TO PROVIDE, NOR SHOULD THEY BE RELIED ON AS, LEGAL ADVICE. READERS MUST CONSULT WITH QUALIFIED LEGAL COUNSEL BEFORE RELYING UPON ANY CONTENT CONTAINED HEREIN. STATEMENTS MADE IN THESE ARTICLES MAY BE INCORRECT FOR YOUR JURISDICTION OR AT THE TIME WHEN YOU READ SUCH STATEMENTS THE UNDERLYING RULES, REGULATIONS AND/OR DECISIONS MAY NO LONGER BE CONTROLLING OR PERSUASIVE AS A MATTER OF LAW OR INTERPRETATION.

Telephone: 917-520-2836
Fax at 720-559-2800
E-mail to bsinger@rrbdlaw.com

FOR DETAILS ABOUT MR. SINGER, PLEASE READ HIS
ONLINE BIOGRAPHY
PAGE TOP