Securities Industry Commentator by Bill Singer Esq

March 17, 2022








http://www.brokeandbroker.com/6338/breuer-doj-russia-2022/
  In March 2011, United States Assistant Attorney General Lanny Breuer traveled to Russia to attend, of all things, the American Conference Institute's "Moscow Anti-Corruption Summit," replete with high-profile private-sector sponsors and a pricey $3,925 registration fee. I voiced my opposition to the AAG's participation in the conference in "One Day In the Life Of Lanny Breuer (the Moscow Anti-Corruption Summit)" (BrokeAndBroker.com Blog / March 17, 2011). Just going by events in 2022, that 2011 ACI anti-corruption seminar didn't accomplish jack. Perhaps the 2023 Anti-Corruption Summit will be held in Kiev or Kiyv or however the hell they will spell what's left of the city after the Russians have reduced it to rubble. 
  In my March 17, 2011 blog about the Moscow anti-corruption summit, I referenced an article that I had written for Forbes.com: "The Great Kentucky Caviar Criminal Caper Comes To An End In Ohio." Inexplicably, Senator Rand Paul plagiarized my Forbes' Kentucky caviar article for use in a book that he purportedly authored; see: "Section Of Rand Paul's Book Plagiarized Forbes Article / More copying and pasting from the senator. The author was unaware, but flattered, Paul used his wording" (BuzzFeed.News by Andrew Kaczynski / November 5, 2013). Adding insult to injury, the reporter who uncovered Senator Paul's plagiarism of my article, misconstrued my sarcasm about plagiarism being a sincere form of flattery as implying that I was, indeed, flattered by Senator Paul. I was not. I'm still not. Talk about being victimized twice! 

https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/pr/founder-cyberfraud-prevention-company-pleads-guilty-defrauding-investors-over-100
Adam Rogas pled guilty in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York to one count of securities fraud. As alleged in part in the DOJ Release:

ADAM ROGAS was a co-founder of NS8, and served as its CEO, CFO, and a member of its board of directors.  ROGAS was also primarily responsible for the company's fundraising activities.  NS8, which was based in Las Vegas, Nevada, was a cyberfraud prevention company that developed and sold electronic tools to help online vendors assess the fraud risks of customer transactions.  In the fall of 2019 and the spring of 2020, NS8 engaged in fundraising rounds through which it issued Series A Preferred Shares and obtained approximately $123 million in investor funds.

ROGAS maintained control over a bank account into which NS8 received revenue from its customers, and periodically provided monthly statements from that account to NS8's finance department so that NS8's financial statements could be created.  ROGAS also maintained control over spreadsheets that purportedly tracked customer revenue, which were also used to generate NS8's financial statements.

ROGAS altered the bank statements before providing them to NS8's finance department to show tens of millions of dollars in both customer revenue and bank balances that did not exist.  In the period from January 2019 through February 2020, between at least approximately 40% and 95% of the purported total assets on NS8's balance sheet were fictitious.  In that same period, the bank statements that ROGAS altered reflected over $40 million in fictitious revenue.

[Ed: Images shown in original]

ROGAS used these materially misleading financial statements to raise approximately $123 million from investors in the fall of 2019 and the spring of 2020.  During the fundraising process, ROGAS also provided the falsified bank records he had created to auditors who were conducting due diligence on behalf of potential investors.  After these fundraising rounds concluded, NS8 conducted a tender offer with the funds raised from investors, and ROGAS received $17.5 million in proceeds from that tender offer, personally and through a company he controlled.

https://www.justice.gov/usao-edny/pr/queens-man-pleads-guilty-multi-million-dollar-prize-notice-fraud-scheme
Scott Gammon pled guilty in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York to conspiracy to commit mail fraud. As alleged in part in the DOJ Release:

[F]rom August 2014 through August 2019, Gammon engaged in a direct-mail scheme that sent fraudulent prize notification mailings to thousands of consumers. The mailings induced consumers to pay a fee, purportedly in return for a large cash prize. None of the consumers who paid the fee ever received such a prize. Gammon is the third defendant to plead guilty to conspiracy to commit mail fraud in connection with this scheme.

Two other defendants previously pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit mail fraud for participating in the scheme. Christopher King pleaded guilty on September 15, 2021 and Natasha Khan, pleaded guilty on December 15, 2021.

https://www.sec.gov/news/press-release/2022-43
  In a Complaint filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas
https://www.sec.gov/litigation/complaints/2022/comp-pr2022-43.pdf, the SEC charged Crosby Independent School District's former Chief Financial Officer, Carla Merka, with misleading investors in the sale of $20 million of municipal bonds in order to pay its outstanding construction liabilities and fund new capital projects. Also, the SEC charged Crosby's auditor, Shelby Lackey, with improper professional conduct in connection with the audit of the school district's 2017 fiscal year financial statements.
  Without admitting or denying any findings and consenting to the entry of an order finding that it violated the antifraud provisions, Crosby ISD agreed to settle the SEC's charges
https://www.sec.gov/litigation/admin/2022/33-11039.pdf. Without admitting or denying the allegations in the Complaint, Merka agreed to pay a $30,000 penalty and not participate in any future municipal securities offerings. The settlement is subject to court approval. 
  Without admitting or denying any of the findings, Lackey  Finally, Lackey agreed to settle the SEC's action
https://www.sec.gov/litigation/admin/2022/34-94426.pdf, and agreed to be suspended from appearing or practicing before the SEC as an accountant with the right to apply for reinstatement after 3 years; and, further, to not serve as the engagement manager, engagement partner, or engagement quality control reviewer in connection with any audit expected to be posted in the MSRB's Electronic Municipal Market Access system until reinstated by the SEC. 
  As alleged in part in the SEC Release:

The SEC's complaint alleges that Crosby ISD, which serves approximately 6,400 students outside of Houston, failed to report $11.7 million in payroll and construction liabilities and falsely reported having $5.4 million in general fund reserves in its audited 2017 fiscal year financial statements. According to the complaint, Crosby ISD and Merka, who was responsible for Crosby ISD's accounting and was the primary contact during the bond financing process, were aware that the financial statements significantly underreported the payroll and construction liabilities. Crosby ISD and Merka knowingly included the false and misleading financial statements in the offering documents used to raise $20 million through the sale of municipal bonds in January 2018. In August of 2018, seven months after the offering, Crosby ISD disclosed that it was experiencing significant financial issues, including that it had a negative general fund balance. The following month, ratings agencies downgraded Crosby ISD's bonds. 

Lackey, who audited Crosby ISD's financial statements, authorized the issuance of the fiscal year 2017 audit report. Lackey was charged by the SEC with failure to perform critical audit procedures necessary to verify the accuracy of Crosby's payroll and construction liabilities. She also violated Generally Accepted Auditing Standards (GAAS) by failing to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence to support the audit opinion, failing to properly supervise the audit, and by failing to exercise professional judgment and maintain professional skepticism.

https://www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressReleases/8501-22
CFTC filed and settled charges via an Order https://www.cftc.gov/media/7056/enfedfmancapitalorder031522/download
against ED&F Man Capital Markets, Ltd., a London-based provisionally registered swap dealer, for failing to comply with certain swap dealer requirements to report accurate swaps data to a swaps data repository ("SDR"), failing to disclose a conflict of interest to swaps counterparties, failing to disclose mid-market marks to counterparties, and for related supervision failures. The CFTC Order imposes a $3,250,000 civil monetary penalty on ED&F Man and orders it to cease and desist from further violations of the Commodity Exchange Act and CFTC regulations, as charged. As alleged in part in the CFTC Release:

[B]etween February 2014 and July 2021, ED&F Man failed to report certain swaps data to an SDR accurately for hundreds of thousands of swaps. The order also finds that, from February 2014 through January 2018, ED&F Man failed to disclose to its U.S. swaps counterparties that proprietary traders, trading on behalf of an affiliate, had access to counterparties' trade information. Further, from February 2014 to April 2021, ED&F Man failed to disclose mid-market marks to some of its counterparties as required for numerous metals and FX swaps. The order also finds that ED&F Man failed to maintain an adequate supervisory system and to perform its supervisory obligations diligently with respect to swaps data reporting, conflict of interest disclosures, and providing mid-market marks. 

In a wide-ranging speech, CFTC Chair Behnam notes in part that:

The issues that are top of mind and the focus of our energies in early 2022 are very much the same that we have dealt with before, but perhaps our demographics have changed.  The industry's population is shifting, having increasingly emerged from the technology sector rather than being firmly rooted in the financial markets.  We also have a massive influx of retail participants empowered by technology and an endless stream of information to pursue opportunities the moment any barrier to entry recedes.  And then there are the exchanges, intermediaries, and innovators who are eager to meet demand for products and services through increasingly nontraditional models that both give us pause, and inspire us to engage and explore new possibilities for fitness within the regulatory fold.

https://www.finra.org/media-center/newsreleases/2022/report-finra-board-governors-meeting-march-2022
In pertinent part, the FINRA Release states:

WASHINGTON-FINRA's Board of Governors met on March 9-10 for the first time in 2022. The Board approved three rulemaking items and discussed a variety of topics, including technology initiatives and matters pertaining to regulatory operations.

The FINRA Board discussed FINRA's multi-year effort to transform its registration and disclosure programs and received an update on the organization's ongoing Digital Experience Transformation, an initiative designed to integrate and simplify brokerage firms' digital interactions with FINRA, thus facilitating more efficient and effective compliance programs. The Board also received an update from FINRA's Member Supervision department, which recently published the 2022 Report on FINRA's Examination and Risk Monitoring Program, a library of information and resources to help firms inform their compliance programs.

As is customary for the first meeting of the year, the FINRA Board approved the allocation of prior-year fine monies to various capital initiatives in accordance with FINRA's Financial Guiding Principles. FINRA will release details about the allocations in an upcoming Report on the Use of 2021 Fine Monies.

The FINRA Board met with Securities and Exchange Commission Chair Gary Gensler. The Board often hosts SEC officials and various stakeholders during a portion of its meetings, and this was Chair Gensler's first visit with the FINRA Board.

"We were honored to hear Chair Gensler speak about the regulatory priorities of the Commission, which provided us with an opportunity to think about how they intersect with FINRA's regulatory priorities," said FINRA CEO Robert W. Cook. "We look forward to continuing to work with the SEC as we pursue our investor protection mission."

Rulemaking

The Board approved three rule proposals:
  • Proposals Relating to Registration of Offices and Remote Inspections - The Board approved the submission to the SEC of several proposals related to member firms' supervision obligations and process-related changes in response to remote and hybrid work environments.
  • Amendments Relating to Routing Disclosures for OTC Equity Securities and Centralized Hosting of SEC Rule 606(a) Reports - The Board approved the submission to the SEC of proposed rule amendments to require members to: (a) publish order routing reports for held orders in OTC equity securities and submit them to FINRA for publication on the FINRA website; and (b) submit Regulation NMS Rule 606(a) order routing reports to FINRA for publication on the FINRA website.
  • Amendments to Rules Related to the Arbitration of Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment Claims - The Board approved the submission to the SEC of proposed amendments to align FINRA rules with the Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment Act of 2021. . . .
https://www.finra.org/sites/default/files/fda_documents/2020066817601
%20Steven%20Martin%20Barnett%20CRD%201143510%20AWC%20sl.pdf
For the purpose of proposing a settlement of rule violations alleged by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority ("FINRA"), without admitting or denying the findings, prior to a regulatory hearing, and without an adjudication of any issue, Steven Martin Barnett submitted a Letter of Acceptance, Waiver and Consent ("AWC"), which FINRA accepted. The AWC asserts that Steven Martin Barnett was first registered in 1983, and from February 2018 to June 2, 2020, he was registered with FINRA member firm LPL Financial, LLC. In accordance with the terms of the AWC, FINRA found that Barnett violated FINRA Rules 4511 and 2010; and the regulator imposed upon him a $5,000 fine and a 30-calendar-day suspension from associating with any FINRA member in all capacities. As alleged in part in the AWC:

Between March 22, 2018 and May 19, 2020, Barnett mismarked at least 74 mutual fund order tickets as unsolicited when he had solicited the trades. Barnett marked the order tickets as unsolicited when he made investment recommendations in connection with customers reallocations of their mutual fund portfolios. Barnett's mismarking of these orders caused LPL to make and maintain inaccurate books and records. 

https://www.finra.org/sites/default/files/fda_documents/2020067520001
%20Donovan%20Thomas%20Kelly%20CRD%202622366%20AWC%20sl.pdf
For the purpose of proposing a settlement of rule violations alleged by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority ("FINRA"), without admitting or denying the findings, prior to a regulatory hearing, and without an adjudication of any issue, Donovan Thomas Kelly submitted a Letter of Acceptance, Waiver and Consent ("AWC"), which FINRA accepted. The AWC asserts that Donovan Thomas Kelly was first registered in 1994, and by 2012, he was registered with FINRA member firm Independent Financial Group ("IFG"). In accordance with the terms of the AWC, FINRA found that Kelly violated FINRA Rules 4511 and 2010; and the regulator imposed upon him a $10,000 fine and a seven-month-suspension from associating with any FINRA member in all capacities. As alleged in part in the AWC:

Between April 2016 and July 2018, Kelly participated in private securities transactions outside the regular course or scope of Kelly's employment with IFG by recommending 19 investors to purchase promissory notes in an oil and gas drilling company, summarizing the investment for the investors, and arranging for some of the investors to fund the purchases through sales and money transfers from their IFG accounts. The promissory notes were securities. Collectively, these 19 individuals invested $688,000 in the company. These investors consisted of 16 of his IFG customers, including himself, and 3 other individuals who were not IFG customers. Kelly did not receive compensation for the investments. 

Kelly failed to provide any written or other form of notice to IFG prior to his participation in these transactions. Further, when asked on multiple annual firm attestation forms whether he had participated in private securities transactions, Kelly answered "no."

http://www.brokeandbroker.com/6340/sec-crs-denial/
After a whistleblower files a Form WB-APP with the SEC in order to secure a Whistleblower Award, far too much time elapses until the issuance of a Preliminary Determination by the Claims Review Staff. SEC Chair Gensler needs to reform the manner in which the CRS handles its docket, which seems to have mushroomed into somewhat unmanageable dimensions given the growing chorus of complaints from Claimants and their lawyers. Before you buy into the recent spate of self-serving press about the SEC Whistleblower Program, consider a recent case in which one deserving whistleblower was jerked around by the process.