Securities Industry Commentator by Bill Singer Esq

August 19, 2022












https://www.brokeandbroker.com/6615/aegis-frumento-insecurities-whistleblower/
Veteran lawyer Aegis Frumento warns that being a whistleblower is not for the faint of heart. Wannabe whistleblowers often torpedo their careers by standing up to illegal conduct. The investing public often benefit from such sacrifices but the tipsters may pay a heavy price. Then again, that's why the lure of a Whistleblower Award is so enticing. Unfortunately, the law does not make recovery of awards easy for those who blew the whistle. As Frumento sees it, whistleblowers often end up drenched in a hard rain falling.

https://www.brokeandbroker.com/6614/mastroianni-doj-finra/
In today's blog, author Bill Singer is taking advantage of a golden opportunity to show the investing public how a minimal amount of due diligence involving only a few minutes (at most) may reveal inconsistencies between what an investing professional is presenting to you as his/her bona fides. In many cases, there may be reasonable explanations as to various dates and prior employment. In other cases, you may come away with more questions and few answers. Regardless, not enough investors kick the tires and take a test drive. Hopefully, this blog will serve as an eye-opener.

https://www.brokeandbroker.com/6613/ifs-westworld/
It's summer. It's a Wednesday. BrokeAndBroker.com's dashing, debonair, and effervescent personality Bill Singer is in a whimsical mood. Or perhaps it's gas from one too many burritos. With Bill you just never know. Whimsy or flatulence aside, Bill's sort of hot and tired and not really in a particularly serious mood today. On top of that, what the hell was with the final season of Westworld? Was that Dolores or not, and more to the point, that's four years out of my life that I won't get back. But, I digress. Yeah, but, c'mon: "Halores?" That's the best you could come up with? Really? One last loop around the bend. Maybe this time we'll set ourselves free. I don't think so.

https://cei.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Ryan_Nabil_-_Regulatory_Sandboxes-3.pdf
Some of you will agree with author Nabil. Some of you won't. Regardless, it's a thoughtful paper that expresses the growing frustration with the failure of our regulatory framework to nurture innovation and cultivate newer but safe investments. As Nabil asserts in his article's opening comments [footnote omitted]:

Around the world, leading financial centers seek to attract companies capable of developing innovative financial products and services. From blockchain-based payments to alternative credit scoring systems, technological innovation is critical to maintaining a globally competitive financial sector that benefits consumers, investors, and entrepreneurs. However, the financial services industry, especially in the United States, remains heavily regulated. Such cumbersome regulations can deter both established companies and startups from offering innovative financial products and services. Governments can use various policy tools to address this challenge and promote innovation. 

Among the options gaining popularity are "regulatory sandbox" programs, which allow companies to test innovative products and services under a modified and frequently lightened regulatory framework for a limited period. These programs allow companies to test new financial products and enable regulators to become more familiar with technological innovation and its impact on businesses. By allowing regulators to evaluate how different rules impact businesses, sandbox programs can provide crucial information to help regulators craft business- and innovation-friendly rules. 

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/california-man-receives-10-year-sentence-following-guilty-plea-south-carolina-fraud
After pleading guilty in the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina to conspiracy to commit fraud, Scott Kohn, 68, was sentenced to 10 years in prison plus three years of supervised release and ordered to forfeit $297 million. Previously entering guilty pleas were co-conspirators Kraig S. Aiken, David N. Kenneally, Melanie Jo Schulze-Miller, and Joseph P. Hipp. As alleged in part in the DOJR Release, Kohn:

ran a corporation called Future Income Payments LLC (FIP), formerly known as Pensions, Annuities, and Settlements LLC. From April 2011 until April 2018, Kohn and his co-conspirators used FIP as a vehicle for a nationwide Ponzi scheme.   

Kohn and his co-conspirators solicited pensioners experiencing financial distress, most of whom were military veterans, by offering an upfront lump-sum payment in exchange for an assignment of the rights to their monthly pensions and disability payments. Even though the assignment transactions were characterized as "sales," they were, in fact, usurious loans with annual interest rates of as much as 240%. 

Kohn and his co-conspirators - working through a network of hundreds of financial advisors and insurance agents nationwide - then solicited thousands of seniors to purchase FIP's "structured cash flows," which were the pensioners' monthly pension payments. Kohn and his co-conspirators induced these seniors to invest their retirement savings with FIP by making false assurances of a significant rate of return on their investment, concealing the usurious nature of FIP's transactions with the pensioners and lying about the financial health of the corporation.

During the seven years the scheme operated, Kohn drew upon FIP funds to live a lavish lifestyle. When the Ponzi scheme ultimately collapsed, Kohn and his co-conspirators had caused more than $310 million in losses to more than 2,500 retirees and had placed more than 13,000 veterans into exploitative loans.
https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdfl/pr/investment-scam-ringleader-pleads-guilty-after-being-recorded-paying-cash-kickbacks
Paul Geraci pled guilty in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida to conspiring to commit mail fraud and wire fraud. Previously, the following pled guilty to their role in the same scheme:

Michael Assenza, a/k/a "Michael Grimaldi", 44, of Boca Raton, Florida, the former Director of Technology at Social Voucher pleaded guilty and was sentenced to 52 months' imprisonment on August 11, 2022;

Ted Romeo, a/k/a "Ted Lamar", 62, of Pompano Beach, Florida, an employee of Geraci's boiler room who solicited Social Voucher investors, pleaded guilty and is scheduled to be sentenced on August 26, 2022;

Paul Vandivier a/k/a "Doug Wright", 61, of West Palm Beach, Florida, who operated a boiler room that solicited Social Voucher investors, pleaded guilty and is scheduled to be sentenced on October 7, 2022;

Cindy Vandivier a/k/a "Madison Brooke" a/k/a "Madison Brookes", 64, of West Palm Beach, Florida, who helped her husband operate a boiler room that solicited Social Voucher investors, pleaded guilty and is scheduled to be sentenced on October 7, 2022.

Gerald Parker, 78, of Juno Beach, Florida, the former Chief Executive Officer of Social Voucher, is still awaiting trial, currently scheduled for September 27, 2022.  The case is assigned to United States District Judge Rodney Smith in Fort Lauderdale, Florida

In part the DOJ Release alleges that:

Geraci admitted in plea documents that, from the fall of 2016 until December 2018, he used Pinnacle Atlantic to fraudulently sell stock in a Florida company called Social Voucher.com, Inc. ("Social Voucher") that was later referred to as Stocket, Inc. ("Stocket").  Geraci admitted that he and others at Pinnacle Atlantic took commissions as large as 50 percent of the investment, a fact that was not disclosed to investors.  According to Geraci's plea documents, he paid co-defendant Ted Romeo in cash to pitch Social Voucher stock even though Ted Romeo had a civil judgment against him (a fact that was, again, not disclosed to investors).  Geraci also admitted that he knew the Social Voucher stock offering was not registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission or state regulators.  According to Geraci's plea agreement, he caused between $1.5 and $3.5 million in loss to the investors. 

According to court filings by the Government, Geraci was recorded several times during the scheme.  For example, Geraci was recorded pitching Social Voucher stock to an undercover FBI agent posing as an investor, telling the FBI agent on the recording that his investment money was "all for programming and software and so and so." In reality, the FBI agent invested $50,000 in undercover funds and half the money went into Geraci's pocket.  Geraci was also recorded paying cash kickbacks at a Boca Raton Starbucks to a man he knew was under a federal fraud indictment in Detroit, in exchange for securing investors.  Geraci was recorded explaining to this Detroit fraudster that he wouldn't disclose the kickbacks to the fraudster on tax returns and that is what he did for his employees "with these special backgrounds."

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/former-member-congress-charged-multiple-fraud-schemes
In an Indictment filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California
https://www.justice.gov/opa/press-release/file/1526756/download, Terrance John "TJ" Cox was charged with 15 counts of wire fraud, 11 counts of money laundering, one count of financial institution fraud, and one count of campaign contribution fraud. As alleged in part in the DOJ Release:

[C]ox perpetrated multiple fraud schemes targeting companies he was affiliated with and their clients and vendors. Cox created unauthorized off-the-books bank accounts and diverted client and company money into those accounts through false representations, pretenses and promises. From 2013 to 2018, across two different fraud schemes, Cox illicitly obtained over $1.7 million in diverted client payments and company loans and investments he solicited and then stole.

In addition, Cox allegedly received mortgage loan funds from a lender for a property purchase by submitting multiple false representations to the lender, including fabricated bank statements and false statements that Cox intended to live in the property as his primary residence. However, the indictment alleges Cox intended to and did buy the property to rent it to someone else.

According to allegations in the indictment, Cox also fraudulently obtained a $1.5 million construction loan to develop the recreation area in Fresno known as Granite Park. Cox and his business partner's nonprofit could not qualify for the construction loan without a financially viable party guaranteeing the loan. Cox falsely represented that one of his affiliated companies would guarantee the loan, and submitted a fabricated board resolution which falsely stated that at a meeting on a given date all company owners agreed to guarantee the Granite Park loan. No meeting took place, and the other owners did not agree to back the loan. The loan later went into default causing a loss of more than $1.28 million.

According to allegations in the indictment, when Cox was a candidate for the U.S. House of Representatives in the 2018 election, he perpetrated a scheme to fund and reimburse family members and associates for donations to his campaign. Cox arranged for over $25,000 in illegal straw or conduit donations to his campaign in 2017.

Order Determining Whistleblower Award Claims ('34 Act Release No. 34-95537; Whistleblower Award Proc. File No. 2022-77)
https://www.sec.gov/rules/other/2022/34-95537.pdf
The SEC's Claims Review Staff ("CRS") issued Preliminary Determinations recommending the a Whistleblower Award to Claimant 1 of over $1,500,000 and to Claimant 2 of almost $800,000. The Commission ordered that CRS' recommendations be approved. The Order asserts that [Ed: footnote omitted]:

We find the award allocation is appropriate. While both Claimant 1 and Claimant 2 provided information that, in part, caused the opening of the investigation, Claimant 1 provided more ongoing helpful information and assistance to the Enforcement staff as compared to Claimant 2. 

https://www.sec.gov/litigation/litreleases/2022/lr25476.htm
Without admitting or denying the allegations in an SEC Complaint filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York Eric Scheffey consented to the entry of a final judgment permanently enjoining him from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act  and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, ordering a $75,000 civil penalty, and imposing a penny stock bar. The SEC's litigation against four remaining defendants and two relief defendants is ongoing. As alleged in part in the SEC Release

[K]alistratos "Kelly" Kabilafkas secretly purchased essentially all of the outstanding stock of a shell company now known as Airborne, which he secretly controlled, and then distributed millions of shares among himself and his associates, including Scheffey. As alleged, Scheffey participated in Kabilafkas' scheme by deceiving broker-dealers in order to have the shares deposited in his brokerage accounts and cleared for sale to the public. The complaint alleges that Scheffey then sold these shares into the public market while an Airborne promotional campaign was underway.

https://www.finra.org/sites/default/files/fda_documents/2019061500001
%20Morgan%20Stanley%20Co.%20LLC%20CRD%208209%20AWC%20lp.pdf
For the purpose of proposing a settlement of rule violations alleged by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority ("FINRA"), without admitting or denying the findings, prior to a regulatory hearing, and without an adjudication of any issue, Morgan Stanley & Co., LLC submitted a Letter of Acceptance, Waiver and Consent ("AWC"), which FINRA accepted. The AWC asserts that Morgan Stanley & Co., LLC has been a FINRA member firm since 1990 with 30 registered representatives at four branches. In accordance with the terms of the AWC, FINRA imposed upon Morgan Stanley & Co., LLC a Censure and $250,000 fine. As alleged in part in the AWC's "Overview"[Ed: footnote omitted]:

Between August 2017 and May 2019, Morgan Stanley reported approximately 9.6 million transactions in National Market System (NMS) securities without a required short sale indicator in violation of FINRA Rules 6182 and 2010. Between November 2014 and June 2019, the firm reported 2,240 transactions in Over the Counter (OTC) equity securities without the required short sale indicator in violation of FINRA Rules 6624 and 2010. Additionally, between November 2014 and June 2019, Morgan Stanley failed to establish and maintain a supervisory system, including written supervisory procedures, reasonably designed to achieve compliance with FINRA Rules 6182 and 6624 in violation of NASD Rule 3010 and FINRA Rules 3110 and 2010.

https://www.finra.org/sites/default/files/fda_documents/2019064955001
%20Yan%20Binder%20CRD%202932226%20AWC%20gg.pdf
For the purpose of proposing a settlement of rule violations alleged by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority ("FINRA"), without admitting or denying the findings, prior to a regulatory hearing, and without an adjudication of any issue, Yan Binder submitted a Letter of Acceptance, Waiver and Consent ("AWC"), which FINRA accepted. The AWC asserts that Yan Binder was first registered in 1997 and by 2015, he was registered with Wells Fargo Advisors Financial Network, LLC. In accordance with the terms of the AWC, FINRA imposed upon Binder a $10,000 fine and a 30-calendar-day suspension from associating with any FINRA member in all capacities. As alleged in part in the AWC:

At all times during the relevant period, Wells Fargo's written supervisory procedures provided that electronic business communications could only be transmitted through firm sponsored and authorized systems in order to facilitate the firm's preservation and supervision of such communications. In addition, the firm's written supervisory procedures prohibited registered representatives from sending or responding to business communications by text message. Further, during 2017, Respondent received a reminder from the firm about the need to refrain from communicating with customers about securities business via text message. However, from at least August 2018 through May 2019, Respondent used unapproved channels to exchange numerous text messages with a firm customer about securities-related business. Therefore, the firm did not prese1ve those messages. 

Through this conduct, Binder violated FINRA Rules 4511 and 2010. 

Bill Singer's Comment: To be blunt, this AWC strikes me as a pile of stale, stinking garbage bordering on nonsense. The AWC states that Binder left Wells Fargo in December 2019, so he wasn't even associated with the firm for some 33 months. More to the point, the cited texting started in August 2018, which is four years ago! For godsakes, what the hell is the point or purpose of fining and suspending a rep for four-year-old texts? If FINRA was truly focused on the problem here, it's that Wells Fargo had a rep who was texting from at least August 2018 through May 2019, a span of some 9 months before compliance or someone woke up and finally put an end to it. So, that's sort of an indictment of Wells Fargo's compliance program. In addition, since Wells Fargo filed a Form U5 on December 23, 2019, disclosing the alleged texting by Binder, what the hell has FINRA been doing for the last three years? Like I said, this is garbage regulation and looks like someone sweeping up after the circus elephants have passed by.

In a FINRA Arbitration Statement of Claim filed in December 2021, FINRA member firm Claimant FSC Securities asserted that:

since terminating his relationship with Claimant as an independent contractor, Respondent inappropriately saddled it with customer commission chargebacks and litigation expenses related to insurance product sales by Respondent, which were subsequently disputed by Respondent's customers.

Claimant FSC sought $364,292.70 in compensatory damages plus interest and costs; however, at the FINRA Arbitration hearing, Claimant withdrew $200,000 of its requested damages related to two state court litigation claims brought by Respondent's clients. Respondent Bedillion generally denied the allegations and asserted affirmative defenses. The FINRA Arbitration Panel denied Claimant FSC's claims.

https://www.brokeandbroker.com/6612/td-ameritrade-u5-negligent/
A panel of three FINRA arbitrators found TD Ameritrade's management to have been grossly negligent and failing to use due diligence. Okay, sure, the victimized associated person won damages but there just doesn't seem to be any regulatory consequences for TD Ameritrade. That gap in Wall Street's regulatory scheme always seems to favor the big boys to the detriment of the small fry. Time and time again this same quirk in FINRA's oversight pops us but the self-regulatory-organization just doesn't respond -- or, perhaps, just doesn't give a damn.